Veterinarians’ Perceptions of Point-of-Care Diagnostics
A Comparative Study Across Germany, France, the UK & the US
Point-of-care (POC) diagnostics—such as rapid tests, portable PCR devices, in-clinic lab equipment,
AI-enabled cytology, and handheld imaging—are becoming more common in veterinary care.
This study examines how veterinarians across four major regions view the value, challenges, and future potential of these tools.
Study Purpose
The research aimed to compare perceptions of POC diagnostics across Germany, France, the UK and the US, focusing on clinical usefulness, workflow impact, cost considerations, confidence in interpreting results, training needs and usability, and future adoption intentions.
Study Design
Sample: 200 veterinarians (50 per country)
Practice Types: 60% small animal, 25% mixed, 15% large/production
Method: 10-item Likert survey
Practice Types: 60% small animal, 25% mixed, 15% large/production
Method: 10-item Likert survey
Participant Profile
Average age: 46.2 years
Experience: 15.3 years
Experience: 15.3 years
Key Findings
- Strong belief in clinical value: Faster diagnosis and better patient outcomes.
- Cost remains a major barrier: Highest concern in Germany and France, lower in the US.
- Training is essential: Strongest agreement across all regions.
- Accuracy perceptions vary: Confidence highest in the US, lowest in France and Germany.
- Client expectations drive adoption: “Fast results” is a top motivator.
- Future usage expected to rise: US and UK show strongest intent.
Regional Differences at a Glance
| Region | Adoption Mindset | Key Driver | Key Barrier |
|---|---|---|---|
| US | Highly optimistic | Client demand & innovation culture | Cost (moderate) |
| UK | Positive but cautious | Clinical evidence & guidelines | Operational fit |
| Germany | Interested but hesitant | Accuracy and scientific rigor | Cost & scepticism |
| France | Lowest adoption intent | Growing awareness | Training & budget constraints |
What This Means
Veterinarians recognize the value of POC testing—especially for urgent care, chronic management, and communication with pet owners—yet adoption is uneven. The main limiting factors are cost, workflow integration, and training gaps.
Recommendations
- Affordable pricing or leasing models.
- Local validation studies demonstrating clinical and financial benefits.
- Interoperable systems with practice software.
- AI-supported interpretation and onboarding training.
Conclusion
Point-of-care diagnostics are viewed as an emerging standard in veterinary medicine. With the right support, particularly around cost, training, and workflow integration, POC tools have strong potential to become routine in both companion-animal and livestock settings across the US and Europe.
Our Global Clients
Our data-driven insights have influenced the strategy of 200+ reputed companies across the globe.
